Paper 1 Preliminary Results
2026-09-11 — corrected source candidate (analytical check only)
The editable D3 scanned-plate Design was corrected and saved through the GUI: Gaussian s-type 13, 5 MeV electrons, local +Z, emission Z = -0.005 cm, 2 cm FWHM, X scan -48.5 to +48.5 cm, 321 trapezoidal nodes, totfact = 1. The source restriction was removed (reg omitted) to avoid conditioning the Gaussian on the narrow source air cell. The 3 cm RAMAL preview support remains a display/containment parameter and is not a physical cutoff.
The existing immutable Q21 edge-loss Case and Result below are unchanged and do not represent this revised Design. No new PHITS result is claimed here.
python3 tools/check_paper1_scan_profile.py compares the unconditioned source
mixture with the exact uniform-line/Gaussian convolution. It samples 10,001
X coordinates over the scan interval plus four sigma at each end. Error is
the maximum absolute density difference expressed as a percentage of the
continuous interior plateau (1 / scan length), not relative error in tails.
| Nodes | Spacing (cm) | Maximum profile error (% of plateau) |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 4.85 | 127.813578 |
| 41 | 2.425 | 31.948897 |
| 81 | 1.2125 | 4.449213 |
| 161 | 0.60625 | 1.045594 |
| 321 | 0.303125 | 0.257952 |
These comparisons all use the corrected inset interval. For Q321, the analytical normal-incidence interception of the 100 x 10 cm plate is 99.971236%, leaving approximately 0.028764% geometric spill. This calculation ignores upstream scattering and is not PHITS transport evidence. The inset must be called reduced-spill, not strictly no-spill: an unbounded Gaussian always has tails. This remains a one-dimensional line scan with Gaussian Y distribution, not uniform irradiation of the full plate face.
Q321 is a refined preliminary candidate, not an accepted scientific threshold. Next: create a new immutable Case from this Design, verify the incident profile and downstream transport in PHITS, and compare source-resolution sensitivity before D3/D5 acceptance. Multi-source normalization remains per primary source electron; old downstream fields must not be relabelled as corrected results.
This file records traceable preliminary calculations used to refine the open Paper 1 decisions. These Results are not D3 acceptance evidence and are excluded from the production Dataset unless a later approved protocol explicitly says otherwise.
2026-09-10 — D3 scanned-plate transport discovery
Status: completed and integrity-verified; preliminary transport discovery only. Not D3 acceptance. Not eligible for D7 acceptance or the production Dataset.
Provenance
| Record | Value |
|---|---|
| Project | industrial-eb-x-ray-dose-prediction |
| Design | d3-industrial-scanned-plate-preliminary |
| Case | preliminary-transport-discovery-not-d3-acceptanc-001 |
| Job | job-001 — Preliminary transport discovery run 1 |
| Attempt / Result | a0001 / result-0001 |
| Execution | local PHITS; return code 0 |
| Start / completion | 2026-09-10T13:14:35Z / 2026-09-10T13:41:01Z |
| Random seed | 1639214267 |
| Histories | 10,000 per batch, 10 batches, 100,000 total |
| Field | 103 x 20 x 40 cells; 82,400 voxels |
| Quantity | ambient dose equivalent H*(10), PHITS multiplier -200 |
| Normalization | pSv/primary-source-electron at the source plane |
The immutable Case contains a 5 MeV monoenergetic electron source, a local
Gaussian spot with 2 cm FWHM and declared 3 cm support diameter, and 21
scan centres from -50 cm to +50 cm. The uniform continuous scan is
approximated with trapezoidal weights: 0.025 at both endpoints and 0.05 at
the 19 interior nodes. The weights sum to one and totfact=1.
The component is a rectangular 100 x 10 x 0.08 cm natural-tantalum plate,
followed by 0.2 cm water and 0.2 cm Type 304 stainless steel. The water and
steel thicknesses are interim Petwal-derived transport assumptions, not an
industrial thermal or mechanical design. The endpoint footprint spill is
intentional: scan centres reach the plate edges while the declared spot support
extends another 1.5 cm laterally. This Result therefore represents an
edge-loss diagnostic, not a representative full-interception baseline.
Execution and transport findings
- PHITS completed all ten batches in
1567.14 stotal CPU time. - PHITS reported zero geometry warnings, zero geometry-error terminations, zero recovered geometry errors, and zero lost particles.
- The requested low-energy neutron tables resolved to the available
50cJENDL-4 family. PHITS reported that18040.50clacks gamma-ray-production cross sections. - PHITS reported missing
1001.20uphotonuclear data and used its physical model for the corresponding hydrogen reactions. This is a declared transport-applicability limitation, not an execution failure. - The PHITS production summary recorded
404photons and202positrons. It did not list produced neutrons.
Field observations
The verified combined field maximum is 1.5471
pSv/primary-source-electron; RAMAL-EBX reports 5.337% relative standard error
at that maximum-dose voxel. Particle-page maxima read directly from the
persisted VTK field are:
| PHITS page | Particle | Maximum (pSv/primary-source-electron) |
Nonzero voxels |
|---|---|---|---|
p1 |
all | 1.5471 |
81,856 |
p2 |
electron | 1.5377 |
6,958 |
p3 |
photon | 0.038964 |
81,814 |
p4 |
positron | 0.00014793 |
466 |
p5 |
neutron | 0 |
0 |
Many low-dose voxels remain poorly converged; one inspected voxel had 27.23%
RSE, and the uncertainty field reaches 100% in scored voxels. The Q21 source
quadrature is also unconverged. Consequently, this field must not establish D7
statistical thresholds, converter efficiency, accepted converter thickness, or
a production reporting range by itself.
Consequences and next comparisons
- Retain this immutable Result as pipeline, transport-resolution, and edge-loss evidence only.
- Create a paired no-spill preliminary Design by retaining the
100 cmplate and contracting scan-centre travel to-48.5 cmthrough+48.5 cm. This changes only the edge-interception condition and is preferred before adding another plate-size variable. - Compare endpoint-spill and no-spill fields before freezing revised D3.
- Then test scan quadrature convergence with
Q21,Q41, andQ81using a predefined field/profile difference measure. - Repeat transport checks at the upper Paper 1 energy boundary before drawing
any conclusion about neutron relevance. The observed zero-neutron page at
5 MeVis not evidence for the entire5–7.5 MeVdomain. - Use the same immutable VTK field for the existing 1D profiles and exploratory XY/XZ/YZ 2D slices. The 2D view supports physical slice position, particle-page selection, linear/log10 values, and the aligned RSE field, but still needs fixed cross-Case colour ranges and provenance-bearing exports before it is a paper figure or cross-Case comparison.