Skip to content

Paper 1 Preliminary Results

2026-09-11 — corrected source candidate (analytical check only)

The editable D3 scanned-plate Design was corrected and saved through the GUI: Gaussian s-type 13, 5 MeV electrons, local +Z, emission Z = -0.005 cm, 2 cm FWHM, X scan -48.5 to +48.5 cm, 321 trapezoidal nodes, totfact = 1. The source restriction was removed (reg omitted) to avoid conditioning the Gaussian on the narrow source air cell. The 3 cm RAMAL preview support remains a display/containment parameter and is not a physical cutoff.

The existing immutable Q21 edge-loss Case and Result below are unchanged and do not represent this revised Design. No new PHITS result is claimed here.

python3 tools/check_paper1_scan_profile.py compares the unconditioned source mixture with the exact uniform-line/Gaussian convolution. It samples 10,001 X coordinates over the scan interval plus four sigma at each end. Error is the maximum absolute density difference expressed as a percentage of the continuous interior plateau (1 / scan length), not relative error in tails.

Nodes Spacing (cm) Maximum profile error (% of plateau)
21 4.85 127.813578
41 2.425 31.948897
81 1.2125 4.449213
161 0.60625 1.045594
321 0.303125 0.257952

These comparisons all use the corrected inset interval. For Q321, the analytical normal-incidence interception of the 100 x 10 cm plate is 99.971236%, leaving approximately 0.028764% geometric spill. This calculation ignores upstream scattering and is not PHITS transport evidence. The inset must be called reduced-spill, not strictly no-spill: an unbounded Gaussian always has tails. This remains a one-dimensional line scan with Gaussian Y distribution, not uniform irradiation of the full plate face.

Q321 is a refined preliminary candidate, not an accepted scientific threshold. Next: create a new immutable Case from this Design, verify the incident profile and downstream transport in PHITS, and compare source-resolution sensitivity before D3/D5 acceptance. Multi-source normalization remains per primary source electron; old downstream fields must not be relabelled as corrected results.

This file records traceable preliminary calculations used to refine the open Paper 1 decisions. These Results are not D3 acceptance evidence and are excluded from the production Dataset unless a later approved protocol explicitly says otherwise.

2026-09-10 — D3 scanned-plate transport discovery

Status: completed and integrity-verified; preliminary transport discovery only. Not D3 acceptance. Not eligible for D7 acceptance or the production Dataset.

Provenance

Record Value
Project industrial-eb-x-ray-dose-prediction
Design d3-industrial-scanned-plate-preliminary
Case preliminary-transport-discovery-not-d3-acceptanc-001
Job job-001Preliminary transport discovery run 1
Attempt / Result a0001 / result-0001
Execution local PHITS; return code 0
Start / completion 2026-09-10T13:14:35Z / 2026-09-10T13:41:01Z
Random seed 1639214267
Histories 10,000 per batch, 10 batches, 100,000 total
Field 103 x 20 x 40 cells; 82,400 voxels
Quantity ambient dose equivalent H*(10), PHITS multiplier -200
Normalization pSv/primary-source-electron at the source plane

The immutable Case contains a 5 MeV monoenergetic electron source, a local Gaussian spot with 2 cm FWHM and declared 3 cm support diameter, and 21 scan centres from -50 cm to +50 cm. The uniform continuous scan is approximated with trapezoidal weights: 0.025 at both endpoints and 0.05 at the 19 interior nodes. The weights sum to one and totfact=1.

The component is a rectangular 100 x 10 x 0.08 cm natural-tantalum plate, followed by 0.2 cm water and 0.2 cm Type 304 stainless steel. The water and steel thicknesses are interim Petwal-derived transport assumptions, not an industrial thermal or mechanical design. The endpoint footprint spill is intentional: scan centres reach the plate edges while the declared spot support extends another 1.5 cm laterally. This Result therefore represents an edge-loss diagnostic, not a representative full-interception baseline.

Execution and transport findings

  • PHITS completed all ten batches in 1567.14 s total CPU time.
  • PHITS reported zero geometry warnings, zero geometry-error terminations, zero recovered geometry errors, and zero lost particles.
  • The requested low-energy neutron tables resolved to the available 50c JENDL-4 family. PHITS reported that 18040.50c lacks gamma-ray-production cross sections.
  • PHITS reported missing 1001.20u photonuclear data and used its physical model for the corresponding hydrogen reactions. This is a declared transport-applicability limitation, not an execution failure.
  • The PHITS production summary recorded 404 photons and 202 positrons. It did not list produced neutrons.

Field observations

The verified combined field maximum is 1.5471 pSv/primary-source-electron; RAMAL-EBX reports 5.337% relative standard error at that maximum-dose voxel. Particle-page maxima read directly from the persisted VTK field are:

PHITS page Particle Maximum (pSv/primary-source-electron) Nonzero voxels
p1 all 1.5471 81,856
p2 electron 1.5377 6,958
p3 photon 0.038964 81,814
p4 positron 0.00014793 466
p5 neutron 0 0

Many low-dose voxels remain poorly converged; one inspected voxel had 27.23% RSE, and the uncertainty field reaches 100% in scored voxels. The Q21 source quadrature is also unconverged. Consequently, this field must not establish D7 statistical thresholds, converter efficiency, accepted converter thickness, or a production reporting range by itself.

Consequences and next comparisons

  1. Retain this immutable Result as pipeline, transport-resolution, and edge-loss evidence only.
  2. Create a paired no-spill preliminary Design by retaining the 100 cm plate and contracting scan-centre travel to -48.5 cm through +48.5 cm. This changes only the edge-interception condition and is preferred before adding another plate-size variable.
  3. Compare endpoint-spill and no-spill fields before freezing revised D3.
  4. Then test scan quadrature convergence with Q21, Q41, and Q81 using a predefined field/profile difference measure.
  5. Repeat transport checks at the upper Paper 1 energy boundary before drawing any conclusion about neutron relevance. The observed zero-neutron page at 5 MeV is not evidence for the entire 5–7.5 MeV domain.
  6. Use the same immutable VTK field for the existing 1D profiles and exploratory XY/XZ/YZ 2D slices. The 2D view supports physical slice position, particle-page selection, linear/log10 values, and the aligned RSE field, but still needs fixed cross-Case colour ranges and provenance-bearing exports before it is a paper figure or cross-Case comparison.